Search  
www Labour Protect
 

 

 

 

 

 


Constructive Dismissal and refusal to accept withdrawal of resignation

28-JUN-07

Bester and Marais
[Const Dism]
Case No. FS2955-06
Jurisdiction: Bethlehem
Commissioner: MC van Aarde, Commissioner
Subject: Constructive Dismissal

Issue:

The applicant resigned her employment. She attempted to retract it. When her employer would not allow her to withdraw the resignation, she made application to the CCMA on the grounds that either she had been constructively dismissed (because of a comment that caused the resignation) or that the employer’s unwillingness to agree that the resignation could be withdrawn amounted to an unfair labour practice.

Summary of Facts:

The applicant resigned her employment after remarks were made to her by a supervisor that she considered inappropriate. The remarks were that she was the ‘wip’ of her supervisor (an attorney). Her evidence was that she viewed being called “Van Rensburg’s ‘wip’ as having a negative (sexist) meaning being “the w**** or slut of Van Rensburg”.

After the resignation the applicant approached her employer on two occasions to ignore the resignation but it would not do so.
The applicant claimed that the failure to revoke the acceptance of the resignation was unfair and constituted an unfair labour practice. In the alternative, she claimed that she been constructively dismissed.

Summary of Judgement:

The Commissioner held that the two points on which the applicant based her claim were mutually exclusive. On this point, the Commissioner stated:

‘Generally speaking, in constructive dismissal cases, the employee terminates the contract of employment because the employer has made continued employment intolerable for the employee. Relief in the sense of reinstatement appears to be in contradiction with a claim of constructive dismissal (unless of course if the affected employee could be relocated or transferred to an alternative branch/position away from the source of the dissatisfaction, which is obviously not always possible)’.

In relation to the constructive dismissal claim, the Commissioner noted that the applicant’s two requests to her employer to withdraw her resignation were inconsistent with a desire to leave the services of her employer, which is the very nature of a constructive dismissal. That part of her claim was unsuccessful.

In relation to the unfair labour practice claim, the Commissioner took the view that an employer’s refusal to accept an employee’s request to revoke a resignation does not fall with the definition of an ‘unfair labour practice’. In resigning her employment, the applicant had taken a considered decision and it fell within the respondent’s prerogative to accept or refuse her request to withdraw her resignation. This part of her claim was also unsuccessful.

The application was dismissed with no costs order made.

>> case law

 

(c) Bridge Marketing 2000-2010 All right are hereby reserved.

The information provided on this site is subject to Labour Protect's standard "Terms of Use" and is to be used strictly in conjunction with the further advice of a professional labour expert or attorney.  By using this site, the user agrees that Labour Protect shall not be liable for any damages that may arise from any cause whatsoever.

Live chat by SightMax
 

For employers:

 |National Assistance: 0860 LABOUR/ 0860 522687

Click on the arrow below and see what we can do for you...

 

 

 

 

To join...
 (the Membership Fee is only R85pm):

Home About us Assistance FAQ Contact us JOIN NOW!
Rollover Button by Vista-Buttons.com v5.7